This guest post is from Logan Wolf, pastor of NewMorningChurch.com. Logan and his wife are planting New Morning Church in Utah. See his bio below the post.
___________________
I am a church planter. As such I subscribe to the belief that America needs more churches. The first couple chapters of almost every church planting book present numerical and statistical data as to why that is, so I’m not going to rehash it here. Instead, I want to share a single observation that should be reason enough:
There are still people in our own country who do not know Jesus Christ as their personal Savior.
Beyond the walls of our existing churches there is an immense void where the Gospel has not yet taken hold. This fact should concern those churches, but I believe the solution begins with starting new ones. Church planting is an enterprise that delves into that void. A church planter goes beyond those familiar walls, past their realm of influence and in the thick, inky darkness strikes a match. While new churches may not have the financial resources or pooled experience of a large staff, they do have two advantages when it comes to shining the light of the Gospel.
First, new churches operate with an almost panicked urgency. It’s as if they are sitting in a crowded theater and someone has yelled, “Fire!” (Which is the second worst thing you can yell in a theater after, “Bruce Willis is a ghost!”) If a church planter wants to preach to someone on Sunday, he has to go get them. Whereas many established churches end up relegating outreach to a single night during the week, that’s all new churches have to do. And without a calendar full of committee meetings, choir rehearsals, counseling appointments, and Upward Soccer practices, that’s what gets done. New churches reach people.
Second, new churches are versatile within their communities. A new church is not encumbered in its methodology but can quickly adjust in order to take advantage of newly presented opportunities. (Thus, adhering to Michael Scott’s second rule of business: adapt, react, re-adapt, act.) They have a freedom that many established churches do not. They never run up against the dreaded, “We’ve never done it that way before,” because nothing has ever been done. A church planter is able to look around and ask himself, “How can I best get the Gospel in front of these people?”, and then go do it. New churches make the most of their circumstances.
Understand that I’m not saying every established church is lacking in these areas. However, while urgency and versatility may be a characteristic of an existing ministry, they are the definitive of new ones and necessary in our efforts to reach those around us with Gospel.
Logan Wolf abandoned his surfboard in order to start a church Provo, Utah. You can learn more about his ministry at newmorningchurch.com.








7 comments
Daniel says:
Nov 15, 2011
When I talk to church planters about how a new work can be nimble and versatile, I always wonder, “how do you hold onto that?”
Every church was new at some point, so is rigidity just a byproduct of time? Could our new churches stay flexible?
Logan Wolf says:
Nov 15, 2011
The problem is clutter, both metaphorical and actual. A newly wed couple hardly has enough stuff to fill a one bedroom apartment. A couple that has been married for sixty years has an attic, garage, and shed that are jammed full. Over time I think churches find all this great stuff they think they have to be a part of when really it serves only to distract them from their responsibility to the Gospel. The solution is a minimalist approach to ministry. “This one thing I do” (Philippians 3:13), to the exclusion of everything else that could be done. I suggest reading “Simple Church” by Thom Rainer and Eric Geiger.
Michael R. Wolf says:
Nov 15, 2011
I have seen where the nimbleness of the new start-up, whether here or on the foreign field, has not been maintained with the growth and age of the church. I believe the burden and it’s urgency must be passed on to the faithful converts. The start up church with it’s tiny nucleus can and will make numerous contacts daily and intentionally. The pastor of the new church plant typically should be getting much more “face to face time” in the environment he has based himself; if he truly has a burden he won’t waste God’s time. He will be out meeting people.
However, the church that is well established, aged, and often subject to a slower pace of execution can still be extremely powerful in winning souls. The congregation is the body of Christ. If the preaching and the teaching is sound, those from the congregation who truly have the fire of Christ in them, become the missionaries to the community. The church as a tangible entity can still be a big, bureaucratic, cumbersome beast. But if the Lord is moving in that church and the people go from the sanctuary to the community with the gospel, then the urgency is addressed and I would say that is a successful mission work. The key at any stage in a church is whether or not Christ is in the body.
Chris says:
May 17, 2012
Logan, I believe that Timothy Keller has written an essay on the necessity of church planting. Have you read it? He has some excellent points on the need for more churches, many of which you mentioned in this post.
Logan Wolf says:
May 22, 2012
Chris, I’ve not read it. I can’t seem to find it either. His church planting manual written with Allen Thompson keeps popping up. Is that what you’re talking about?
Chris says:
May 23, 2012
I think this should be it: http://redeemercitytocity.com/content/com.redeemer.digitalContentArchive.LibraryItem/19/Why_Plant_Churches.pdf
Logan Wolf says:
Jul 16, 2012
Chris,
Thanks for sharing. I just put it on my iPad and plan on reading it soon.